<<
Prev | Page 1 | Page 2
| Page 3 | Next
>>
Dracula’s
Daughter (1936)
Synopsis
Countess Marya Zaleska (Gloria Holden,
playing the titular character) comes to London to steal the
body of her father. By destroying it, she hopes to rid herself
of the curse of vampirism that has plagued her family –
but she cannot help taking victims again. Edward Van Sloan
returns as ‘Von’ Helsing.
Cary: Let's get one thing clear, right
away. This is my least favorite of the bonus films.
Shawn: Easily mine too. Okay - first
off... Why change Van to Von Helsing?
Cary: Theory 1: They didn't have "Find/Replace" and
they were just fucking lazy. Theory 2: The "a" key stuck
on the typewriter.
Shawn: I wish theory 2 was the case.
I would love to have seen the film called Drcul's Dughter.
Or, better yet - Droculo's Doughter.
Cary: So I did some digging on IMDB looking for other
films by this director. Lambert Hillyer also directed a film a few
years before this (1938) called "Women in Prison". I thought
that was interesting since all of the Countess' victims are women.
Yet she was compelled to try to make a guy her eternal lover... which
once again shows the undeniable power of the dick.
Shawn: Continuing the homoerotic
thread from the original, no doubt. My favorite exchange in the whole
movie is between the Countess and her assistant, Sandor.
[Paraphrasing] Countess: I want to go to a happy place
with TREES!
Sandor: With EVIL trees?
Countess: No... happy trees, with birds singing.
Sandor: EVIL birds... singing EVIL songs?
Countess: No... wait... I need to go out and kill someone.
By the way, one of the Countess’ victims is indeed
a male, though you are forgiven for not remembering that,
because it is unmemorable. Hey Cary... "There's a few
birds in London I'd like to shoot... and they haven't feathers
either!" Wink, wink. Nudge, nudge.
Cary: Yes, the dialogue was completely atrocious.
I really don’t see anything about this movie where we’re
going to disagree. I think we've spent more time on it than we probably
should. The one thing you can't say, though, is that Gloria Holden
isn't memorable in her role as the... whatever the fuck she was...
Shawn: Everyone is so fucking lame
in this movie it hurts.
Son
of Dracula (1943)
Synopsis
Lon Chaney Jr. stars as the
Count (this time Count Alucard) who comes to Louisiana to
claim local psychic Katherine (Louise Allbritton) as his latest
bride. Her fiancé must defeat the Count in order to
save her.
Cary: Lon Chaney Jr. as Dracula may
be one of the worst casting choices ever made. He comes across
like someone from your uncle's bowling league in this role.
No accent, the sex appeal of a walnut, and he's seducing a
TOTAL FUCKING BABE! Again, Louise Allbritton = Babe.
I'm a complete sucker for the Bettie Page look!
Shawn: As the only Dracula that
can be seen in a mirror, he’s twice the Chaney for the lovin'!
Cary: I did like the story being set in Louisiana,
though. The change of scenery is interesting.
Shawn: Yeah, I think it was certainly
entertaining. The transformation scenes are cute, and I do mean "cute" in
that same way the annoying girl at the office says, "Those shoes
are 'cute.'"
Cary: I went to see who was responsible for the story
on this one and I was surprised. Curt Siodmak is credited. He wrote The
Wolf Man, The Beast With Five Fingers, Earth
vs. The Flying Saucers.
Shawn: The Invisible Man
Returns.
Cary: The man has his share of hits. I love the last
lines of this one though:
[Paraphrasing] Man 1: "You mean to
tell me that skeleton is all that's left of Count Alucard?"
Man
2: "It's got his ring with his family crest on
it. The same crest that's on
his luggage."
Goddamn it I love when that kind of CSI work is given the
spotlight in these old flicks.
Shawn: Absolutely. "A-L-U-C-A... Hmmmmm!” I'm
surprised there wasn't a scene where they hold a mirror up to the nametag and
yell out "Oh MY GOD!" while the score crescendos.
Cary: That would have
been awesome! I love how they tie
up all the loose ends with a few lines of dialogue. The one guy is still wanted
for murder but that's dismissed by one of the characters with, "I think
we'll have a say in that." Like two guys telling the local authorities, "It
was a vampire named Alucard but he was really Dracula" is gonna work. Even
in Louisiana that shit won't fly.
Shawn: Man
1: "So he was named Dracula... and he was a vampire?"
Man
2: "Yes.”
Man
1: "Bullshit."
Man
2: "Uh.... he was black too. Don't worry - we killed him."
Man
1: "Why didjnt ya say so!"
THAT would fly in Louisiana! But all things considered, this is still
the best of the "sequels."
Cary: I beg to differ my friend. I'm a big, big fan of House
of Dracula.
House
of Dracula (1945)
Synopsis
Count Dracula comes to visit
Dr. Edelman, a doctor who may have the cure for his vampirism.
By a twist of fate, Lawrence Talbot (the Wolf Man) shows up
for help also. Then, amazingly, they find out the Frankenstein
monster is on the premises. Chaos ensues…
Cary: Honestly, this is one of my all-time
favorites in the "Let's rip this sonofabitch apart MST3K-style" category.
I love this movie. It is SO bad, it's good.
Shawn: I won't argue that point.
I don't really see it as a sequel though. It's like the Destroy
All Monsters finale of the Universal Horror Films. I love
how Dracula's existence is completely unexplained - seeing as how
the true Dracula... Lugosi... died in the original.
Cary: I know. He dies in every single one. Maybe
they figured they didn't need to cover it this time since some jackhole
probably pulled the stake out AGAIN. I remember the first time I saw
this movie was on the Legacy set. I picked up the phone and called
friends telling them to get over here to watch it. You've got Dracula,
Wolf Man, Frankenstein’s Monster, a mad scientist/Dr. Jekyll
character… shit, there's even a hunchbacked nurse!
Shawn: Universal’s motto must
have simply been “Fuck continuity!” They should have plastered
it to the studio gates. And speaking of the “Green Machine,” don't
you think the Frankenstein Monster was sorely underused?
Cary: Absolutely. He's thrown in just to get him
in the picture. The plot is just ludicrous, also. I love how things
just happen and no one thinks twice about it. The Wolf Man comes around
about the same time as when Dracula shows up. The Frankenstein monster
just happens to be buried in the caves at the foot of the cliff below
the castle.
Shawn: That same cave just happens
to be the place where the Wolf Man's antidote can be incubated.
Cary: It's obvious that the plot was thought up in
thirty minutes over a three-martini lunch.
Shawn: Yeah, and scribbled
quickly down on the wet cocktail napkin. I think it's fascinating
that the Jekyll/Hyde transformation of Dr. Edelman has absolutely
no catalyst causing him to switch back and forth between the personalities.
That's my favorite bit. Well, that and Chaney's father/son talk with
him afterwards.
Lon Chaney Jr.:
"I know you killed that coach driver, doctor. But hey...
I kill people too
and I'm not that bad a guy."
Cary: And goddamn
are the actors phoning it in on this one. Lon Chaney Jr. is
essentially playing himself. Having read your piece about
the Browning film and how much you enjoyed watching Frye's
take on Renfield, I can see how this would be your favorite
part.
Shawn: I hadn't thought
of that connection. It's certainly a valid comparison, but
as you said - the movie fucking rocks because it has a hunchback
nurse. I bet she'd be an easy lay too.
Cary: The impediment
makes missionary a problem, but really... I'm not a big fan
of missionary. John Carradine as Dracula... not my favorite
in the role by far.
Shawn: No, not at all.
Lugosi still reigns in that department.
Cary: Still, overall,
the one reason I bought all the Legacy sets was to have these
films. I think there's no getting around how much sense it
makes to pay an extra five to ten bucks and have these things
at your fingertips.
Shawn: And in such
sexy packaging at that!
Cary: No shit!
The packaging rocks.
<<
Prev | Page 1 | Page 2
| Page 3 | Next
>
|