You
get no Saw puns out of me, kids. The title
is too easy and, besides, I think they’ve all been done
anyway. That sort of thinking, however, does not stop anyone
from making a dark, gritty movie about a serial killer that
goes to insane extremes to send his message. The bar was set
for the current generation with Silence of the Lambs,
it was cleared by Seven (please note my refusal
to spell it with an actual “7” in place of the
“V.”) and it was practically knocked over by The
Cell. Many mediocre films followed and the genre
was forever redefined. Now, we have Saw.
Two men, Adam (Leigh Whannell, also the films writer)
and Dr. Larry Gordon (Cary “As You Wish” Elwes)
wake up to find themselves chained on opposite sides of a
abandoned bathroom that is so dirty, it makes most truck stop
owners cringe. They share the room with a body located in
the middle of the room that evidently would just prefer to
lie there all dead and bleeding like, instead of lending a
hand to help these two gents out of their predicament. After
finding some micro cassettes on their persons, the two men
discover they are part of some twisted game of life and death
and are given instructions on how to play. Basically, Dr Gordon
has to kill young Adam before the clock strikes six, or else
Gordon’s family will meet a grim fate. The whole M.O.
seems all too familiar to Dr. Gordon, and he explains to Adam
that his past had intertwined with this nutter before. The
good doctor was once a suspect in these same types of killings,
and now he appears to be a victim. Yup. It appeared to be
the work of “The Jigsaw Killer.”
A pretty simple premise that could have gotten
damned claustrophobic damn fast.
A
pretty simple premise that could have gotten damned claustrophobic
damn fast. However, director James Wan and writer Whannell
were smart enough to pick up on this and allow us to escape
to the outside world via flashbacks and some visits to the
Gordon family home. We also get some fresh air by being introduced
to Detective Tapp (Danny “I’m Too Old for This
Shit” Glover) who has an issue or two to settle with
Mr. Jigsaw Killer-guy. It all becomes surprising, twisty-turny
as the clock slowly creeps its way to that six o’clock
deadline.
In our growing desensitization to violence, our serial killers
need to be nuttier and nuttier, therefore our man Jigsaw is
pretty bonko. Setting up traps and games for his victims,
he doesn’t so much kill them as set up opportunities
for the little hamsters to kill themselves.
Leaving a man naked entwined in razor
wire with a limited amount of time he is given to escape or
attaching a “reverse bear trap” to a woman’s
jaw who also has a limited amount of time to cut open some
dude’s stomach. All pretty gruesome stuff, granted,
but oddly not really “sold.” Wan relies on the
type of camera tricks one would expect from a gritty film
that attempts to be “edgy” in this day and age,
but he oddly doesn’t know how to use them. The film
ultimately doesn’t so much feel like it has a style
but more of an attempt at one. Being a first-time director,
he should have stuck to mood and simplicity before diving
into the NIN/Tool bag of tricks. Also, even though I commend
them for knowing that a compelling story could not be crafted
about two guys stuck in a room (at least with their current
abilities as filmmakers) all the flashbacks and jumping around
did not come across all that smoothly. Non-linear storytelling
can be difficult and Wan just didn’t seem to be able
to rise to the challenge. The movie itself is certainly entertaining
enough, and it is worth it just for the ride, and to find
out how you react to how it all ties up (I, myself, generally
had it figured out, but the details caught me off guard).
Just don’t expect to be seeing anything all that fresh
and new.
How's It Look,
Smart Guy?
This film is presented on a flipper disc with the full screen
version on one side and an anamorphic widescreen version on
the other. Both are fairly clean transfers the same of care
one should expect for a movie that was in the theatres within
a year of its DVD release. Minimal artifacting and no haloing
that I detected, but the blacks certainly could have been
blacker. I did notice that every once in a while some shots
were blurrier than others and I have a feeling that is due
more to the transfer itself than the director forgetting to
focus the camera. I’m willing to give him the benefit
of the doubt, in that case. All in all, above average.
How's It Sound, Ya
Bum?
The disc is presented in 1.85:1 anamorphic video. Lion’s
Gate has always been pretty touch-and-go for me, transfer-wise.
Sometimes a release is pretty crisp and other times it’s
murkyville. Saw rests firmly in the middle.
In some cases those blacks are pretty deep and others they
gray up on you, losing detail. This is not only evident where
variation might be intended, say from switching from flashback
to flashback, but sometimes it was from shot to shot during
the same scene. I noticed no haloing or edge enhancement,
but a little more care could have been given to this one.
You Think I Just
Wanted The Movie, Pal?
There is a COMMENTARY TRACK by director Wan and writer
Whannell, who obviously love what they do, and good for them.
According to the track, this sucker was filmed in a mere 18
days so for any gripes I may have concerning the style of
the movie, my hat does go off to them for making an otherwise
tight little film in such a short amount of time. They are
both pretty hyper so be prepared.
There is a short making of DOCUMENTARY, called
Sawed Off: The Making of Saw. It’s only two minutes
long so there’s no pain to watching it, but no real
need to either. Fluff.
Finally, we get two versions of the MUSIC VIDEO for Fear Factory’s “Bite
the Hand That Bleeds Me,” (whatever…) rated and
unrated, plus a making of doc for the video itself. Again,
it’s short but it doesn’t serve much purpose.
Bring Us On Home,
Brother
This is most certainly not the next generation in serial killer
movies but merely an extension on what has come before. Personally,
I feel if the script was simplified a bit or even pushed off
until the director was ready for such a narrative undertaking
this might have been one heck of a barnburner. Perhaps with
a little more skill, he also could have kept poor Cary Elwes
from making such an ass out of himself, but his hamminess
adds to the fun, for some reason. As is, it’s a slightly
clunky, but entertaining psychopath film.
|